Figures S7 and . (A) Left , Example sweeps show that I K1 is diminished in Kir2.1 kd -CMs and the remaining current is insensitive to acute hypoxia. Kir2.1 kd -CMs are identified by expression of GFP ( inset , scale bar = 10 μm). Right , summary data from 8 to 10 cells per group show that the regulation of I K1 by hypoxia, SUMO1, and SENP1 is lost in Kir2.1 kd -CMs. (B) The magnitude and the regulation of I K1 by hypoxia, SUMO1, and SENP1 are unaltered when cells are treated with a control, scrambled shRNA; 7-8 cells per group. (C) Left , Example traces to show that including diC8-PIP 2 in the pipette solution reduces the hypoxic inhibition of I K1 in RVCMs in a concentration-dependent manner. The arrow indicates the change in current magnitude between exposure to ambient O 2 and 2% O 2 in the same cell. Right , Concentration-response curve showing that including diC8-PIP 2 in the pipette opposes hypoxic inhibition of I K1 in control RVCMs and RVCMs expressing the scrambled shRNA. The hypoxic-response is diminished in Kir2.1 kd -CMs. Data are mean ± s.d. for 7-8 cells per condition. (D) DiC8-PIP 2 decreases hypoxic inhibition of Kir2.1 channels expressed in HEK293T cells (control) in a concentration-dependent manner using the experimental paradigm described in C, above. Current inhibition is diminished when SENP1 is included in the recording pipette and is not observed when Kir2.1-K49Q channels are studied. Data are mean ± s.d. for 6 cells per condition. (E) PLA shows that native Kir2.1 colocalizes with SUMO1 in RVCMs and that Kir2.1-SUMO interactions are increased by acute hypoxia. Kir2.2 and Kir2.3 do not associate with SUMO1. Representative data are shown with DAPI-labeled nuclei in red and PLA interactions in green for ease of visualization. Summary data are obtained from multiple experiments each with multiple fields of view containing 20-30 nuclei. The scale bar is 10 μm. " width="100%" height="100%">
Journal: iScience
Article Title: Hypoxia inhibits the cardiac I K1 current through SUMO targeting Kir2.1 activation by PIP 2
doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.104969
Figure Lengend Snippet: PIP 2 opposed hypoxic inhibition of I K1 I K1 was studied in rat ventricular cardiomyocytes (RVCMs) using a whole-cell patch-clamp recording. To the knockdown Kir2.1 expression, RVCMs were transduced with lentiviral particles carrying eGFP and shRNA targeting KCNJ2. Kir2.1 knockdown cells (Kir2.1 kd -CMs) were identified by the expression of eGFP. Cells were studied with a control pipette solution (blue), or with pipette solutions containing purified SUMO1 (1 μM, orange) or SENP1 (2 μM, magenta). Where indicated, the control pipette solution contained diC8 PIP 2 . Paired patch-clamp data were analyzed by Students t -test; ∗∗∗, p < 0.01. The proximity ligation assay (PLA) for native Kir2.1-SUMO1 interactions was performed as described in the and analyzed using an unpaired Mann-Whitney rank test, ∗∗∗∗p < 0.001. See also Figures S7 and . (A) Left , Example sweeps show that I K1 is diminished in Kir2.1 kd -CMs and the remaining current is insensitive to acute hypoxia. Kir2.1 kd -CMs are identified by expression of GFP ( inset , scale bar = 10 μm). Right , summary data from 8 to 10 cells per group show that the regulation of I K1 by hypoxia, SUMO1, and SENP1 is lost in Kir2.1 kd -CMs. (B) The magnitude and the regulation of I K1 by hypoxia, SUMO1, and SENP1 are unaltered when cells are treated with a control, scrambled shRNA; 7-8 cells per group. (C) Left , Example traces to show that including diC8-PIP 2 in the pipette solution reduces the hypoxic inhibition of I K1 in RVCMs in a concentration-dependent manner. The arrow indicates the change in current magnitude between exposure to ambient O 2 and 2% O 2 in the same cell. Right , Concentration-response curve showing that including diC8-PIP 2 in the pipette opposes hypoxic inhibition of I K1 in control RVCMs and RVCMs expressing the scrambled shRNA. The hypoxic-response is diminished in Kir2.1 kd -CMs. Data are mean ± s.d. for 7-8 cells per condition. (D) DiC8-PIP 2 decreases hypoxic inhibition of Kir2.1 channels expressed in HEK293T cells (control) in a concentration-dependent manner using the experimental paradigm described in C, above. Current inhibition is diminished when SENP1 is included in the recording pipette and is not observed when Kir2.1-K49Q channels are studied. Data are mean ± s.d. for 6 cells per condition. (E) PLA shows that native Kir2.1 colocalizes with SUMO1 in RVCMs and that Kir2.1-SUMO interactions are increased by acute hypoxia. Kir2.2 and Kir2.3 do not associate with SUMO1. Representative data are shown with DAPI-labeled nuclei in red and PLA interactions in green for ease of visualization. Summary data are obtained from multiple experiments each with multiple fields of view containing 20-30 nuclei. The scale bar is 10 μm.
Article Snippet: Rat Cardiomyocyte Growth Medium (rCGM) BulletKit , Lonza Biosciences , Cat# CC-4515.
Techniques: Inhibition, Patch Clamp, Knockdown, Expressing, Transduction, shRNA, Control, Transferring, Purification, Proximity Ligation Assay, MANN-WHITNEY, Concentration Assay, Labeling